System and method for personal and peer performance ranking of outdoor activities

• US 10,042,893 B2
• Filed: 10/31/2013
• Issued: 08/07/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 10/31/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Under Armour Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Under Armour Incorporated
• Inventors: Thurston, Robin, Wood, Kevin, Callahan, Kevin, Johnck, Sebastian
• Primary Examiner(s): Vital, Pierre
• Assistant Examiner(s): Ho, Andrew N
• Application Number:
  US14/068,972
• Publication Number:
  US 20140122494A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,741 Days
• Field of Search: 707738
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 71/0616 Means for conducting or scheduling competition, league, tournaments or rankings
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24578 using ranking

Abstract

The invention provides a large technological infrastructure to provide a unique comparison of athletic performance using a system. The system can include a unique point system and can compare aggregate athletic performances of different users across different geographical tracks or sections (i.e., Courses). Advantageously, people who cannot do the same course(s) can compete with one another; aggregate performances can be accumulated to give an overall performance metric; and people with differing abilities can compete with one another.

Claims

1. A method for scoring a route, comprising:

collecting a plurality of data relating to a user'"'"'s traversal of said route, said collected data comprising at least one of;

a minimum elevation of said route, a maximum elevation of said route, and a distance of said route;

utilizing said collected data to determine whether said route is substantially ascending, substantially descending, or neither, wherein said act of utilizing said collected data to determine whether said route is substantially ascending, substantially descending, or neither comprises;

determining whether a difference between said minimum elevation and said maximum elevation exceeds a threshold;

when said threshold is not met, indicating that said route is neither substantially ascending nor substantially descending;

when said threshold is met or exceeded, comparing a time stamp data associated with said minimum elevation to time stamp data associated with said maximum elevation;

when said time stamp of said minimum elevation precedes said time stamp for said maximum elevation, indicating that said route is substantially ascending; and

when said time stamp of said maximum elevation precedes said time stamp for said minimum elevation, indicating that said route is substantially descending;

when it is determined that said route is substantially ascending or substantially descending, performing a mathematical calculation with respect to said collected data comprising;

dividing a difference between said minimum and said maximum elevation of said route by a first constant to arrive at a first value;

dividing a difference between said minimum and said maximum elevation of said route squared by said distance of said route to arrive at a second value;

dividing said distance of said route by a second constant to arrive at a third value;

when said route is substantially ascending, dividing said maximum elevation by a third constant to arrive at a fourth value;

when said route is substantially descending, dividing said minimum elevation by said third constant to arrive at a fifth value; and

adding said first, second, third, and fourth or fifth values to arrive at a route value; and

comparing said route value to a table in order to determine a route difficulty category of said route, said table comprising an association of a plurality of route value ranges to a respective plurality of route difficulty categories.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said collected data further comprises:

a time of completion of said route and a type of activity.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein said type of activity comprises at least one of:

cycling and/or running.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein each of said plurality of route difficulty categories is associated with a user point award system and said method further comprises:

comparing said time of completion of said route by said user to respective completion times of a plurality of other users having a same activity type as that of said user in order to determine a rank of said user; and

awarding points to said user based on said rank in accordance with said user point award system associated with said route difficulty category of said route.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising generating a leaderboard for display to said user, said leaderboard including a plurality of users arranged in order by said point awards, wherein said collected data is received from a GPS-enabled mobile device carried by the user, the GPS-enabled mobile device comprising a GPS receiver, a display, a microprocessor, and a wireless communication transceiver coupled to the GPS receiver, wherein said leaderboard is displayed on the display of said GPS-enabled device.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein said leaderboard is updated periodically.

7. A method for ranking a plurality of users traversing a respectively plurality of disparate courses against one another, said method comprising:

for each of said plurality of users, collecting data relating to said traversal from a mobile tracking device carried by said user, said data comprising at least one of;

terrain data relating to a course which was traversed, and a time of completion of said course which was traversed, wherein said terrain data comprises;

a minimum elevation of said course which was traversed, a maximum elevation of said course which was traversed, and a distance of said course which was traversed;

assigning one of a plurality of difficulty levels to at least a portion of each course which was traversed based at least in part on said terrain data, wherein said act of assigning one of said plurality of difficulty levels comprises;

comparing a time stamp of said maximum elevation and said minimum elevation to determine whether said route is substantially ascending, substantially descending, or neither;

when it is determined that said route is substantially ascending or substantially descending, calculating a mathematical formula with respect to said collected data comprising;

dividing a difference between said minimum and said maximum elevation of said route by a first constant to arrive at a first value;

dividing a difference between said minimum and said maximum elevation of said route squared by said distance of said route to arrive at a second value;

dividing said distance of said route by a second constant to arrive at a third value;

when said route is substantially ascending, dividing said maximum elevation by a third constant to arrive at a fourth value;

when said route is substantially descending, dividing said minimum elevation by said third constant to arrive at a fifth value; and

adding said first, second, third, and fourth or fifth values to arrive at a route value; and

comparing said route value to a table in order to determine a route difficulty category of said route, said table comprising an association of a plurality of route value ranges to a respective plurality of route difficulty categories;

for each one of said plurality of difficulty levels, ranking each of those ones of said plurality of users which traversed a course assigned to said difficulty level based on said time of completion thereof;

awarding a first set points to individual ones of said plurality of users according to said act of ranking and said difficulty category;

awarding a second set points to individual ones of said plurality of users based on one or more non-performance related metrics;

for each of said plurality of users, adding said first set of points and said second set of points to generate a total point value therefor; and

generating a leaderboard including individual ones of said plurality of users having highest total point values.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein said traversal comprises cycling.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein said traversal comprises running.

10. The method of claim 7, wherein said one or more nonperformance related metrics comprise at least one of:

a number of times an individual one of said plurality of users has traversed said course which was traversed, whether said course which was traversed is user entered, and whether said course which was traversed is a validated course.

11. The method of claim 7, wherein said act of assigning one of said plurality of difficulty levels further comprises comparing said terrain data to terrain data of a library of validated courses to determine a reasonably comparable course.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said act of comparing further comprises:

creating a rectangle to encompass said terrain data, said rectangle having four sides, each of said sides being derived from said data such that a first side is positioned to align with an eastern-most coordinate, a second side is positioned to align with a western-most coordinate, a third side is positioned to align with a northern-most coordinate, and a fourth side is positioned to align with a southern-most coordinate;

determine a subset of a set of predetermined courses which have coordinates that are within said rectangle;

comparing said subset to a polygon derived from said coordinates of said terrain data to determine whether a threshold amount of said coordinates of said predetermined courses are within said polygon; and

based on said comparison, identifying individual ones of said predetermined courses which are associated to said course which was traversed.

18. The method of claim 7 wherein said mobile tracking device is a GPS-enabled mobile device carried by said user, the GPS-enabled mobile device comprising a GPS receiver, a display, a microprocessor, and a wireless communication transceiver coupled to the GPS receiver, the method further comprising displaying the leaderboard on said GPS-enabled mobile device.

13. A non-transitory computer readable apparatus comprising a plurality of instructions which are configured to when executed by a processor, cause the processor to:

for each of a plurality of users carrying a mobile tracking device and traversing a respectively plurality of disparate courses against one another, collect data relating to said traversal from said mobile tracking device, the data including;

(i) terrain data comprising at least one of;

a minimum elevation of said course which was traversed, a maximum elevation of said course which was traversed, and a distance of said course which was traversed, and (ii) time of completion;

assign a difficulty level to at least a portion of each of said courses which was traversed based at least in part on said terrain data, wherein said assignment of said difficulty level further comprises;

comparison of a time stamp of said maximum elevation and said minimum elevation to determine whether said route is substantially ascending, substantially descending, or neither;

when it is determined that said route is substantially ascending or substantially descending, perform the following calculation;

divide a difference between said minimum and said maximum elevation of said route by a first constant to arrive at a first value;

divide a difference between said minimum and said maximum elevation of said route squared by said distance of said route to arrive at a second value;

divide said distance of said route by a second constant to arrive at a third value;

when said route is substantially ascending, divide said maximum elevation by a third constant to arrive at a fourth value;

when said route is substantially descending, divide said minimum elevation by said third constant to arrive at a fifth value; and

add said first, second, third, and fourth or fifth values to arrive at a route value; and

determine a route difficulty category of said route via comparison of said route value to a table, said table comprising an association of a plurality of route value ranges to a respective plurality of route difficulty categories;

for each difficulty level, rank each of those ones of said plurality of users which traversed a course assigned to said difficulty level based on said time of completion;

award a first set points according to said act of ranking;

award a second set points based on one or more non-performance related metrics;

add said first set of points and said second set of points for each of said plurality of users to generate a total point value therefor;

generate a leaderboard based on said total point values; and

display said leaderboard on a display of the mobile tracking device.

14. The computer readable apparatus of claim 13, wherein said traversal comprises at least one of:

cycling or running.

15. The computer readable apparatus of claim 14, wherein said one or more nonperformance related metrics comprise at least one of:

a number of times an individual one of said plurality of users has traversed said course which was traversed, whether said course which was traversed is user entered, and whether said course which was traversed is a validated course.

16. The computer readable apparatus of claim 14, wherein said assignment said plurality of difficulty levels further comprises a comparison of said terrain data to terrain data of a library of validated courses to determine a reasonably comparable course.

17. The computer readable apparatus of claim 16, wherein said comparison further comprises:

creation of a rectangle to encompass said terrain data, said rectangle having four sides, each of said sides being derived from said data such that a first side is positioned to align with an eastern-most coordinate, a second side is positioned to align with a western-most coordinate, a third side is positioned to align with a northern-most coordinate, and a fourth side is positioned to align with a southern-most coordinate;

determination of a subset of a set of predetermined courses which have coordinates that are within said rectangle;

comparison of said subset to a polygon derived from said coordinates of said terrain data to determine whether a threshold amount of said coordinates of said predetermined courses are within said polygon; and

based on said comparison, identification of individual ones of said predetermined courses which are associated to said course which was traversed.