Rules processing system

• US 20010029499A1
• Filed: 12/28/2000
• Published: 10/11/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 12/30/1999
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: General Electric Company
• Original Assignee: General Electric Company
• Inventors: Ying, Jun, Tuatini, Jeffrey Taihana
• Application Number:
  US09/753,036
• Publication Number:
  US 20010029499A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 706/47
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/6236 between heterogeneous systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

A method and system for providing a common interface to rule engines. A common rule engine interface system defines a single interface through which any rule engine can be accessed. The common rule engine interface system specifies a premise fact object and a derived fact object that is used to contain the premise facts and derived facts needed for particular rule engine. The common rule engine interface system also provides a rule set identifier object that identifies a particular set of rules. The system also provides an evaluator component that inputs the premise facts as attributes of the premise fact object and inputs a rule set identifier object and outputs the derived facts generated by the identified rule set.

Claims

1. A method in a computer system for providing a common interface for accessing different rule engines, the method comprising:

providing a premise fact object representing premise facts;

providing a rule set identifier that identifies rules and a rule engine for processing the rules; and

invoking an evaluator to generate a derived fact object representing facts derived when the identified rule engine applies the identified rules to the premise facts represented by the premise fact object, the evaluator providing a common interface for using a plurality of different rule engines.

2. The method of

claim 1

wherein the evaluator invokes a rule engine adapter for the identified rule engine, wherein the rule engine adapter submits the premise facts to the identified rule engine and stores in the derived fact object the derived facts returned by the identified rule engine.

3. The method of

claim 2

wherein the evaluator invokes a rule engine adapter factory to instantiate the rule engine adapter.

4. The method of

claim 2

wherein the identified rule engine provides an application programming interface that the rule engine adapter uses to submit the premise facts and retrieve the derived facts.

5. The method of

claim 1

wherein the premise fact object has a set fuction for each premise fact, the set functions for setting values of the premise facts.

6. The method of

claim 1

wherein the derived fact object has a get function for each derived fact, the get functions for retrieving values of the derived facts.

7. The method of

claim 1

wherein the premise facts and the rule set identifier are provided by a single data input object.

8. The method of

claim 1

wherein the evaluator uses a premise fact generator to convert the premise facts of the premise fact object to another representation.

9. The method of

claim 8

wherein the other representation is an XML representation.

10. A computer system for accessing rule engines comprising:

a rule engine for applying rules to premise facts to generate derived facts;

a data input object for storing premise facts to be submitted to a rule engine and for storing a rule set identifier that identifies rules and a rule engine;

a data output object for storing derived facts generated by the identified rule engine; and

an evaluator that retrieves the premise facts from the data input object, that submits the retrieved premise facts to the identified rule engine, that requests the rule engine to apply the identified rules to the submitted premise facts, that retrieves the derived facts generated by the rule engine, and that stores the retrieved derived facts in the data output object.

11. The computer system of

claim 10

wherein the evaluator provides the data input object to a rule engine adapter for interfacing with the interface provided with the rule engine.

12. The computer system of

claim 10

wherein a computer program uses the data input object and data output object to generated derived facts from premise facts in a way that is independent of an application programming interface provided by the rule engine.

13. The computer system of

claim 10

wherein the data input object provides functions for setting values associated with the premise facts.

14. The computer system of

claim 10

wherein the data output object provides functions for retrieving values associated with the derived facts.

15. The computer system of

claim 10

including a plurality of rule engines and wherein a rule engine is identified based on the rule set identifier.

16. The computer system of

claim 15

wherein each rule engine provides a different application programming interface.

17. A computer system for accessing rule engines comprising:

a rule engine for applying rules to premise facts to generate derived facts;

means for storing premise facts to be submitted to a rule engine and for storing a rule set identifier that identifies rules and a rule engine;

means for storing derived facts generated by the identified rule engine; and

means for retrieving the premise facts from the stored premise facts, for submitting the retrieved premise facts to the identified rule engine, for requesting the rule engine to apply the identified rules to the submitted premise facts, for retrieving the derived facts generated by the rule engine, and for storing the retrieved derived facts in accordance with the means for storing derived facts.

18. The computer system of

claim 17

wherein the means for storing premise facts is a premise fact object.

19. The computer system of

claim 18

wherein the means for retrieving provides the premise fact object to a rule engine adapter for interfacing with the interface provided with the rule engine.

20. The computer system of

claim 17

wherein the means for storing premise facts and means for storing derived facts are independent of an application programming interface provided by the rule engine.

21. The computer system of

claim 17

wherein the means for storing premise facts provides functions for setting values associated with the premise facts.

22. The computer system of

claim 17

wherein the means for storing derived facts provides functions for retrieving values associated with the derived facts.

23. The computer system of

claim 17

including a plurality of rule engines and wherein a rule engine is identified based on the rule set identifier.

24. The computer system of

claim 23

wherein each rule engine provides a different application programming interface.

25. A computer-readable medium containing:

a premise fact object representing premise facts;

a rule set identifier that identifies rules and a rule engine for processing the rules; and

an evaluator that generates a derived fact object representing facts derived when the identified rule engine applies the identified rules to the premise facts, the evaluator providing a common interface for using a plurality of different rule engines.

26. The computer-readable medium of

claim 25

wherein the evaluator includes a rule engine adapter for the identified rule engine, wherein the rule engine adapter submits the premise facts to the identified rule engine and generates the derived fact object for the derived facts returned by the identified rule engine.

27. The computer-readable medium of

claim 26

wherein the evaluator invokes a rule engine adapter factory to instantiate the rule engine adapter.

28. The computer-readable medium of

claim 26

wherein the identified rule engine provides an application programming interface that the rule engine adapter uses to submit the premise facts and retrieve the derived facts.

29. The computer-readable medium of

claim 25

wherein the premise fact object has a set function for each premise fact, the set functions for setting values of the premise facts.

30. The computer-readable medium of

claim 25

wherein the derived fact object has a get function for each derived fact, the get functions for retrieving values of the derived facts.

31. The computer-readable medium of

claim 25

wherein the premise facts and the rule set identifier are provided by a single data input object.

32. The computer-readable medium of

claim 25

wherein the evaluator uses a premise fact generator to convert the premise facts of the premise fact object to another representation.

33. The computer-readable medium of

claim 32

wherein the other representation is an XML representation.