Emergency response synchronization matrix

• US 20020116242A1
• Filed: 02/22/2001
• Published: 08/22/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 02/22/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: U Chicago Argonne, LLC
• Original Assignee: U Chicago Argonne, LLC
• Inventors: Mitrani, Jacques E., Hewett, Paul L. Jr., Vercellone, James J., Sutter, Robert J.
• Application Number:
  US09/790,851
• Publication Number:
  US 20020116242A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06311 Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group

Abstract

A system and method of providing a graphical depiction of an entire emergency response process via a computer generated emergency response synchronization matrix. The matrix provides for real-time adjustments of the complex emergency response system, which can be viewed on a computer screen or in printed form. The matrix also provides for planning in “negative time”, with reference to the time of the emergency incident, effectively controlling the decisions and actions that must be made and taken before the disaster occurs. The synchronization matrix and the method of generating and implementing the matrix are effective tools in optimizing the planning, exercising, and implementation of emergency response plans, taking into account the interaction of a plurality of independent organizations whose actions and decision will effect the actions and decisions of other organizations in the emergency response process.

Claims

1. A method for coordinating a plurality of emergency responses to a multivariable emergency situation, comprising the steps of:

using an automated system to display the duration, time, and nature of a plurality of complete or incomplete actions and decision events to be performed by a plurality of users;

using an automated system to receive instructions from the plurality of users concerning the actions and decision events; and

using an automated system to alter the time, duration, number, level of completion and nature of a plurality of decision events and actions depending upon the instructions received from the plurality of users regarding a single action or decision event.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the actions and decision events are displayed on at least one graphical interface.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the plurality of users are capable of transmitting instructions to the automated system from a variety of remote locations.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the plurality of users comprise a plurality of government organizations responsible for particular actions or decision events.

5. A method for implementing a plurality of emergency responses to a multiple-variable emergency situation, comprising the steps of:

using an automated system to provide a graphical interface for displaying an emergency situation event;

using an automated system to display on the graphical interface the duration, time and nature of a plurality of completed and incomplete actions performed by a plurality of users, the actions representing a plurality of emergency responses to the emergency situation;

using an automated system to display on the graphical interface a plurality of completed and incomplete decision events for completion by one or more of the plurality of users, each decision event representing a decision to be made in response to the emergency situation;

using an automated system to receive instructions from the plurality of users concerning completed and incomplete actions and decision events;

using an automated system to alter the nature and number of completed and incomplete actions and decision events which are to be commenced and completed depending upon the instructions received from one of the plurality of users concerning actions and decision events; and

using an automated system to alter the time and duration in which particular actions and decision events are to be commenced and completed depending upon the instructions received from one of the plurality of users concerning actions and decision events.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein each completed or incomplete action is designated for one of the plurality of users, wherein only the one of the plurality of users is capable of manipulating the action.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein each completed or incomplete decision event is designated for one of the plurality of users, wherein only the one of the plurality of users is capable of manipulating the decision event.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the graphical interface can be adjusted by the one of the plurality of users to display only those decision events and actions that are designated for the one of the plurality of users.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein instructions regarding actions and decision events can be received from a plurality of remote locations.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the plurality of users comprise a plurality of government organizations responsible for particular actions or decision events.

11. An emergency situation management network, comprising:

a graphical interface for displaying an emergency situation event, the nature, duration and time of a plurality of completed and incomplete actions performed by a plurality of users and the nature and time of a plurality of decision events upon which a decision is to be made by one of the plurality of users, the actions and decision events representing a plurality of responses to an emergency situation;

a memory for storing the nature, duration and time of the actions and the nature and time of the decision events;

means for permitting the plurality of users to input instructions concerning the completion of actions and decisions made in response to a decision event; and

a processor for altering the number, time, duration, and nature of actions and decision events in response to instructions input by the plurality of users.

12. The emergency management network of claim 11, wherein the graphical interface may be accessed by the plurality of users from a plurality of remote locations.

13. The emergency management network of claim 12, wherein instructions can be input by the plurality of users from a plurality of remote locations.

14. The emergency management network of claim 13, further comprising means for designating particular actions or decision events as to be completed by one of the plurality of users.

15. The emergency management network of claim 14, wherein one of the plurality of users may only input instructions concerning actions or decision events that are designated for the one of the plurality of users.

16. The emergency management network of claim 15, wherein the graphical interface is capable of displaying actions and decision events that are designated for only one of the plurality of users.

17. The emergency management network of claim 16, wherein each of the plurality of users comprises a government organization responsible for particular actions or decision events.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein instructions regarding actions, responses, and decision events can be received from a plurality of remote locations.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the plurality of users comprise a plurality of government organizations.

18. A method for implementing an emergency response to a multiple-variable emergency situation, comprising the steps of:

using an automated system to provide a graphical interface for displaying an emergency situation event;

using an automated system to display on the graphical interface a plurality of time intervals, each time interval representing particular phase of the emergency response;

using an automated system to display on the graphical interface a plurality of completed and incomplete decision events for completion by one or more of a plurality of users, each decision event representing a decision to be made in response to the emergency situation;

using an automated system to display on the graphical interface the responses and actions to be completed by one or more users, the responses and actions being represented in one or more time intervals such that the nature, time, level of completion, and duration of the responses and actions can be determined;

using an automated system to receive instructions from the plurality of users concerning completed and incomplete actions, responses and decision events;

using an automated system to alter the nature and number of completed and incomplete actions, responses and decision events which are to be commenced and completed depending upon the instructions received from one of the plurality of users concerning actions and decision events; and

using an automated system to alter the time and duration in which particular actions and decision events are to be commenced and completed depending upon the instructions received from one of the plurality of users concerning actions and decision events.