Cluster bandwidth management algorithms

• US 20030236887A1
• Filed: 06/21/2002
• Published: 12/25/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 06/21/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Check Point Software Technologies Limited
• Original Assignee: Check Point Software Technologies Limited
• Inventors: Peleg, Amos, Kesselman, Alex
• Application Number:
  US10/176,177
• Publication Number:
  US 20030236887A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/226
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/10 Flow control; Congestion control
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/20 Traffic policing
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1001 for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/10015 Access to distributed or replicated servers, e.g. using brokers
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/101 based on network conditions
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1023 based on a hash applied to IP addresses or costs
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1029 using data related to the state of servers by a load balancer

Abstract

A method to manage the bandwidth of a link that is available to a cluster of servers. The method includes establishing a localized bandwidth management policy for at least one of the servers from a centralized management policy of the cluster. The localized policy and the centralized policy are based on a hierarchical policy having a plurality of rules associated with classes of connections that are routed through the link. Each of the rules has an associated rate. The plurality of rules includes a plurality of terminal rules. Establishing the localized policy is performed by prorating the rate of at least one of the terminal rules under the centralized policy according to a first measurement of a usage of the link by the at least one server for the at least one terminal rule. The method also includes operating the at least one server according to the localized policy.

Claims

1. A method to manage a bandwidth of a link that is available to a cluster of servers, comprising the steps of:

(a) establishing a localized bandwidth management policy for at least one of the servers at least partially from a centralized management policy of the cluster, said localized policy and said centralized policy being based on a hierarchical policy having a plurality of rules associated with classes of connections that are routed through the link, each of said rules having an associated rate, said plurality of rules including a plurality of terminal rules, said step of establishing being performed by prorating said rate of at least one of said terminal rules under said centralized policy according to a first measurement of a usage of the link by said at least one server for said at least one terminal rule; and

(b) operating said at least one server according to said localized policy.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said first measurement is measured by a quantity of backlogged connections.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of establishing is performed by all of the servers.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of establishing is performed by said at least one server.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of establishing is performed by another of the servers for said at least one server.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of establishing includes computing said rate of said at least one terminal rule under said centralized policy from a weighting allocation and an activity status of at least one of said rules for the cluster.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein:

(a) said plurality of rules includes a plurality of non-terminal rules; and

(b) said step of establishing includes computing said rate of at least one of said non-terminal rules under said localized policy such that, said rate of said at least one non-terminal rule is substantially equal to a sum of said rates of said terminal rules which are below said at least one non-terminal rule under said localized policy.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of establishing includes computing an interface speed for said at least one server such that, said interface speed is proportional to a sum of said rates of said terminal rules under said localized policy.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of creating a phase state table by one of the servers, wherein said phase state table has a data set which includes, for each of the servers, a second measurement of said usage of the link for each of said terminal rules.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein said second measurement is measured by a quantity of backlogged connections.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein said step of creating is performed on a periodic basis.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein said step of creating is performed when one of said terminal rules becomes active for a first time since said step of establishing was performed.

13. The method of claim 9, wherein said step of establishing is performed using said data set of said phase state table.

14. The method of claim 9, further comprising the step of at least one of the servers maintaining a current state table, wherein said current state table has a data set which includes, for each of the servers, a current measurement of said usage of the link for each of said terminal rules.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein said current measurement is measured by a quantity of backlogged connections.

16. The method of claim 14, further comprising the step of deleting said data set of said current state table which is associated with one of the servers after a predefined timeout.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein said step of maintaining includes synchronizing at least part of said data set of said current state table between at least two of the servers.

18. The method of claim 14, wherein said step of creating is performed by using said data set of said current state table to form said phase state table.

19. The method of claim 9, further comprising the step of distributing said phase state table to at least another of the servers.

20. The method of claim 19, further comprising the steps of:

(a) prior to completion of said step of distributing, assigning a new phase number to said phase state table such that said new phase number is equal to a phase number of a previous phase state table plus one; and

(b) distributing said phase state table with said new phase number.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein said step of establishing is performed by one of the servers when said new phase number is greater than a local phase number, which is maintained locally by one of the servers;

the method further comprising the step of setting said local phase number to be equal to said new phase number.