METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

• US 20040122841A1
• Filed: 12/19/2002
• Published: 06/24/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 12/19/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Anaqua Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Ford Motor Company
• Inventors: Porcari, Damian, Goodman, Bryan Roger, Madani, Bardia, Fricano, Nancy Ann, Schwarzwalder, Robert Nathan Jr., Stieg, Paul Marshall, Beckman, Carol
• Application Number:
  US10/248,127
• Publication Number:
  US 20040122841A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/102
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/18 Legal services

Abstract

One aspect of the present invention includes a computer-implemented method for evaluating intellectual property. One preferred computer-implemented method includes obtaining a plurality of intellectual property (IP) records, preparing an IP data set based on the plurality of IP records, analyzing the IP data set to obtain an at least one IP cluster, and displaying the at least one IP cluster to allow a user to evaluate IP opportunities for the IP data set. IP opportunities include, but are not limited to, licensing, donation, infringement, and competitive intelligence opportunities.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for evaluating intellectual property comprising:

obtaining a plurality of intellectual property (IP) records;

preparing an IP data set based on the plurality of IP records;

analyzing the IP data set to obtain an at least one IP cluster; and

displaying the at least one IP cluster to allow a user to evaluate IP opportunities for the IP data set.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the IP records are comprised of patent records.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein the IP data set includes an at least one non-patent data field for each patent record.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the analyzing step utilizes a self-organizing map technique.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the displaying step is comprised of graphically displaying the at least one IP cluster utilizing data visualization software.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 wherein the IP data set is a licensing set and the evaluating step is comprised of evaluating the licensing set for licensing opportunities based on the at least one IP cluster.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 wherein the IP data set is a donation set and the evaluating step is comprised of evaluating the donation set for donation opportunities based on the at least one IP cluster.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 wherein the IP data set is an infringement set and the evaluating step is comprised of evaluating the infringement set for infringement opportunities based on the at least one IP cluster.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 wherein the IP data set is a competitive intelligence set and the evaluating step is comprised of evaluating the competitive intelligence set for competitive intelligence opportunities based on the at least one IP cluster.

10. A computer-implemented system for evaluating intellectual property comprising at least one computer wherein the at least one computer is configured to:

obtain a plurality of intellectual property (IP) records;

prepare an IP data set based on the plurality of IP records;

analyze the IP data set to obtain an at least one IP cluster; and

display the at least one IP cluster to allow a user to evaluate IP opportunities for the IP data set.

11. The computer-implemented system of claim 10 wherein the IP records are comprised of patent records.

12. The computer-implemented system of claim 11 wherein the IP data set includes an at least one non-patent data field for each patent record.

13. The computer-implemented system of claim 10 wherein the at least one computer is additionally configured to analyze the IP data set based on a self-organizing map technique.

14. The computer-implemented system of claim 10 wherein the at least one computer is configured to graphically display the at least one IP cluster by utilizing data visualization software.

15. The computer-implemented system of claim 14 wherein the IP data set is a licensing set and the at least one computer is configured to evaluate licensing opportunities based on the at least one IP cluster.

16. The computer-implemented system of claim 14 wherein the IP data set is a donation set and the at least one computer is configured to evaluate donation opportunities based on the at least one IP cluster.

17. The computer-implemented system of claim 14 wherein the IP data set is an infringement set and the at least one computer is configured to evaluate infringement opportunities based on the at least one IP cluster.

18. The computer-implemented system of claim 14 wherein the IP data set is a competitive intelligence set and the at least one computer is configured to evaluate competitive intelligence opportunities based on the at least one IP cluster.

19. A computer-implemented system for evaluating intellectual property comprising:

a means for obtaining a plurality of intellectual property (IP) records;

a means for preparing an IP data set based on a plurality of IP records;

a means for analyzing the IP data set to obtain an at least one IP cluster; and

a means for displaying the at least one IP cluster to allow a user to evaluate IP opportunities for the IP data set.

20. The computer-implemented system of claim 19 wherein the IP records are comprised of patent records.

21. The computer-implemented system of claim 20 wherein the IP data set includes an at least one non-patent data field for each patent record.

22. The computer-implemented system of claim 19 wherein the means for analyzing is based on a self-organizing map technique.

23. The computer-implemented system of claim 19 wherein the means for displaying is comprised of data visualization software.

24. A method for identifying a group of related patents comprising:

providing a first group of patents;

collecting a second group of patents citing to at least one patent in the first group; and

for each patent member in the second group, if at least two patents cited to by the patent member are included in the first group, add the at least two patents to a group of related patents,

wherein the group of related patents are identified for licensing opportunities.

25. The method of claim 24 wherein the adding step is comprised of:

for each patent member in the second group, if at least three patents cited to by the patent are included in the first group, add the at least three patents to the group of related patents.

26. The method of claim 24 wherein the first group of patents are assigned to one company.

27. The method of claim 24 wherein the first group of patents are grouped based on technological similarity.