Interactive unified workstation for benchmarking and care planning

• US 20050038669A1
• Filed: 05/02/2003
• Published: 02/17/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 05/02/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Orametrix Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Orametrix Incorporated
• Inventors: Widdig, Jay R., Getto, Phillip, Abraham, Charles L., Taneja, Sanjeev, Sporbert, Peer, Sachdeva, Rohit
• Application Number:
  US10/429,074
• Publication Number:
  US 20050038669A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/22 Social work or social welfare, e.g. community support activities or counselling services
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/40 relating to mechanical, radiation or invasive therapies, e.g. surgery, laser therapy, dialysis or acupuncture

Abstract

An interactive, unified workstation is described that unifies in a single system multitude of functions pertaining to a practitioners practice that would otherwise require disjointed, more expensive, and less efficient individual workstations dedicated to a specific, limited task or a sub-set of tasks. The invention is directed towards benchmarking for a practitioner'"'"'s business practice, and for clinical aspects of treatment planning; and integrating overall patient care planning functions. The unified workstation further facilitates access to archived database resources and facilitates both knowledge base services to practitioners and also hybrid treatment planning, wherein different types of appliance systems (fixed, such as brackets and wires, or removable, such as aligning shells) may be used during the course of treatment.

Claims

1. A method for facilitating evaluation of a practitioner'"'"'s practice from a business view point against industry standards, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a practice benchmarking knowledge database comprising contemporary performance data of industry standard practices;

accessing said practice benchmarking knowledge base via computer software instructions so as to compare performance metrics of the practitioner'"'"'s practice against said industry standard practices;

analyzing, via said computer software instructions, the difference, if any, between each of said performance metrics for said practitioner'"'"'s practice and said industry standard practices; and

providing the results of said step of analyzing to the practitioner, and

when said results are unacceptable to said practitioner, identifying, with the aid of said computer software instructions, one or more proposed corrective actions to more closely align the practitioner'"'"'s practice with said industry standard practices.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said performance metrics of said practitioner'"'"'s practice analyzed via said computer software instructions are selected from the group of performance metrics consisting of:

net fee collected over a period of time;

capital requirements;

space requirements;

number of office visits required by a patient;

actual patient chair time in the office;

assistant and administrative time, including time spent by chair side assistants, lab personnel and assistants, and administration personnel including schedulers, devoted per patient;

practitioner'"'"'s time devoted per patient;

total time elapsed per patient from initial visit to the final visit to said practice;

cost of consumables;

cost of training and certification to maintain proficiency for said practitioner and said practitioner'"'"'s staff;

cost of treatment per patient per visit;

overall cost of treatment per patient;

practice'"'"'s operations workflow;

demographic factors.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said net fee collected excludes selling costs and bad debt.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said capital requirements include maintenance and operating costs.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said cost of consumables includes procuring and storing costs.

6. A method for facilitating care of a patient, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a clinical benchmarking knowledge database comprising clinical treatment history of individual patients;

obtaining a diagnosis of a patient;

obtaining an identification of parameters deemed important concerning said patient;

finding a match in said clinical benchmarking knowledge database by comparing said diagnosis and said parameters for said patient with entries in said clinical benchmarking knowledge database; and

creating an initial treatment plan for the patient with the aid of the match from said clinical benchmarking knowledge database.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said clinical benchmarking knowledge database is created by a sharing of information resources from multiple sources of information.

8. The method of claim 6, further comprising the steps of:

monitoring said patient'"'"'s response to said initial treatment plan;

comparing said monitored response with an expected response expected from said treatment;

when said monitored response does not substantially match said expected response, performing a root cause analysis;

when said root cause analysis indicates need for treatment adjustment, adjusting said initial treatment plan;

when said root cause analysis indicates lack of substantial adherence from said patient to said initial treatment plan, counseling said patient.

9. The method of claim 6, further comprising:

updating said clinical benchmarking knowledge database with said patient'"'"'s records.

10. The method of claim 6, wherein said patient comprises an orthodontic patient and wherein the initial treatment plan comprises a hybrid treatment plan in which a plurality of different types of orthodontic devices (fixed or removeable) are used to treat the patient.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein a first type of orthodontic devices are used during a first portion of the hybrid treatment plan, and a second type of orthodontic devices are used to treat the patient during a second portion of the patient treatment plan.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein the patient is an orthodontic patient and wherein the adjustment of the treatment plan comprises a new path of tooth movement.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein the patient is an orthodontic patient and wherein the adjustment of the treatment plan comprises a change in an appliance type.

14. The method of claim 8, wherein the root cause analysis identifies risks associated with treatment of the patient and identifies an optimum corrective approach in view of the identified risks.

15. A method of facilitating patient care, comprising the steps of:

furnishing information regarding ongoing treatment of a patient to a workstation, said workstation having access to a clinical benchmarking knowledge database comprising clinical treatment histories and characteristics of a plurality of patients;

identifying in the clinical benchmarking database a reference patient and associated treatment plan that matches the patient;

comparing the progress of treatment of the patient with the progress of the reference patient at a comparable elapsed time in treatment, and

providing the results of said comparison to the practitioner.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein, where the results of the comparison indicate a substantial match in progress, adding patient information for said patient to said clinical benchmarking knowledge database.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein, where the results of the comparison do not indicate a substantial match in progress, performing a root cause analysis to identify the source of the lack of progress in the treatment of the patient.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising the step of providing recommendations to the practitioner for improving the care of the patient.

19. The method of claim 15, wherein, when the results of the comparison indicate a substantial match, performing a prediction of the treatment response of the patient and providing the prediction to the practitioner.

20. The method of claim 19, further comprising the step of using the prediction to further schedule appointments for the patient.

21. A method for providing a service for facilitating care of a patient, the method comprising the steps of:

a) providing a clinical benchmarking knowledge database comprising clinical treatment history of a plurality of individual patients,

b) receiving information regarding the diagnosis of said patient and parameters deemed important concerning said patient from a practitioner;

c) finding one or more substantial matches from said clinical benchmarking knowledge database by comparing said diagnosis information and said parameters for said patient with entries in said clinical benchmarking knowledge database; and

d) delivering treatment recommendations for said matches to said practitioner for said patient.

22. The method of claim 21, further comprising the step:

e) charging the practitioner for the use of the clinical benchmarking knowledge basis to determine said match.

24. The method of claim 21, further comprising the steps of:

receiving said parameters of importance to said patient with a relative importance ranking of said parameters;

ranking said one or more substantial matches into a preferred order list by taking into account said relative importance ranking of said parameters of importance to said patient; and

delivering treatment recommendations for said one or more matches to said practitioner for said patient in a said preferred order list.

25. The method of claim 21, further comprising the steps of:

receiving from said practitioner a record of said patient'"'"'s response to said treatment recommendations, and a reference to said match from said clinical benchmarking knowledge database;

comparing said received patient'"'"'s response with that of said match;

when said comparison indicates that said patient'"'"'s response is substantially inferior with that of said match, performing a root cause analysis;

sending results of said root cause analysis, and recommended treatment adjustments to said practitioner; and

further charging said practitioner for at least one of said comparing, said root cause analysis and said recommended treatment adjustments.

26. The method of claim 21, wherein the patient is an orthodontic patient and wherein the said treatment recommendations comprise a recommendation of a hybrid treatment plan in which a plurality of different types of devices (fixed or removeable) are used for treatment of the patient.

27. The method of claim 21, further comprising the step of comparing the progress of the patient during the course of treatment with the clinical benchmarking database and responsively planning adjustments to the course of treatment of the patient.

23. The method of step 22, further comprising the step of keeping a record of the treatment recommendations and the charge assessed to the practitioner.

28. A unified workstation for orthodontic care and treatment of a patient, comprising

a central processing unit and a memory storing a clinical benchmarking knowledge database, software comprising computerized modeling and simulation tools for operation on a model of the dentition of the patient, and interfaces for accessing resources from appliance manufacturers or other sources, and wherein the workstation further comprises software for:

a) developing an initial orthodontic treatment plan tailored to satisfy patient-specific needs,

b) identifying a reference patient in the clinical benchmarking knowledge database that matches, at least approximately, the orthodontic condition of the patient; and

c) obtaining and using data comprising the condition of the patient during the course of treatment and thereby monitoring the progress of the patient in response to the treatmen, and comparing the monitored progress to an expected progress for the patient from the progress of the reference patient.

29. The workstation of claim 28, wherein the initial orthodontic treatment plan comprises a hybrid treatment plan in which different types of orthodontic appliances (fixed or removable) are used during the course of treatment of the patient.

30. The workstation of claim 29, wherein the hybrid treatment plan calls for both removable aligning shells and brackets and wires to be used with the patient.

31. The workstation of claim 28, wherein the workstation is located at a remote location for the site of treatment of the patient.

32. The workstation of claim 28, wherein the workstation is located at the site of treatment of the patient.

33. The workstation of claim 31, wherein the workstation is located at a facility managed by an appliance manufacturer.

34. The workstation of claim 28, wherein the workstation further stores a practice benchmarking knowledge database.

35. A unified workstation system for aiding in facilitating care of an orthodontic patient, comprising:

a general purpose computer system having a processor, a memory and a user interface;

said memory storing a clinical benchmarking knowledge database stored in said computer memory comprising clinical treatment history of individual reference patients, wherein said clinical treatment history comprises for each said reference patient (1) a treatment plan;

(2) three-dimensional data of (a) pre-treatment teeth geometry, and (b) repositioned teeth at at least one milestone of said treatment plan, and (3) a record of patient-specific characteristics;

said memory further storing a patient database comprising said three-dimensional digital information of the patient'"'"'s pre-treatment teeth geometry and a record containing patient-specific characteristics for said patient; and

a set of software instructions operating on said patient database and said clinical benchmarking knowledge database for identifying none, one, or more matches from said reference clinical treatment histories by comparing said patient'"'"'s three-dimensional teeth geometry with the three-dimensional teeth geometry of reference patients in the said clinical benchmarking knowledge database.

36. The system of claim 35, wherein said software instructions arrange said identified matches from said reference clinical treatment histories in a sequential with order by (1) comparing said patient'"'"'s patient-specific characteristics with the patient-specific characteristics of said identified matches and (2) applying value judgment criteria specified by said practitioner.

37. The system of claim 35, wherein said patient database is updated with a set of images comprising 2D and 3D images of said patient'"'"'s repositioned teeth when a milestone in the treatment of the patient is completed.

38. The system of claim 37, further comprising:

a set of software instructions for evaluating said patient'"'"'s progress in response to said treatment by measuring the distance of movement of said patient'"'"'s teeth versus elapsed treatment time, and comparing the results against the data for the same elapsed time period for a match identified in the clinical benchmark knowledge database.

39. The system of claim 35, further comprising:

a software tool for predicting the tooth-movement behavior of said patient under said treatment.

40. The system of claim 39, wherein said software tool assists in scheduling said patient'"'"'s future visits to said practitioner based on said predicting of tooth-movement behavior.

41. The system of claim 35, further comprising:

a software tool for developing benchmarks personalized to said patient.

42. The system of claim 35, further comprising:

a software tool for gathering data related to said patient'"'"'s treatment incorporating said data within said clinical benchmarking knowledge database.

43. The system of claim 35, further comprising:

an artificial intelligence tool for facilitating planning a selection of said treatment for said patient.

44. The system of claim 35, wherein communication from a practitioner with said clinical benchmarking knowledge database is done over the Internet.

45. A unified workstation system for facilitating care of an orthodontic patient, comprising:

a general purpose computer system having a processor, memory and a user interface;

a database containing information for facilitating care of a patient stored in said memory and accessible through said user interface, said information comprising;

diagnosis information comprising (a) clinical examination records in the form of at least one of 2D images, 3D data, CAT scan, MRI, physical model, photographs, digital data from direct scanning of said patient or from scanning of said patient'"'"'s mold, ultra-sonic images, X-rays, etc;

(b) medical health history;

(c) dental health history; and

(c) radio graphic examination records;

therapeutics information comprising treatment and delivery plans information;

care enterprise information selected from the group of information consisting of a) care monitoring and care management information, including information on laboratories, manufacturers, and suppliers for orthodontic treatment apparatus;

b) information on the practitioner and said practitioner'"'"'s assistants; and

c) insurance coverage information for said patient;

communications records comprising at least one of the following;

communication between said practitioner and said patient, between said practitioner and one or more other practitioners, between said practitioner and one or more said laboratories, between said practitioner and one or more said manufacturers, between said practitioner and one or more said supplier; and

a set of software tools enabling said practitioner to access said database and use said database to facility the delivery and management of said care.

46. The workstation of claim 45, wherein the database further comprises patient demographics and financial information for the patient.

47. The system of claim 45, wherein said information and said software tools comprise instructions aiding said practitioner in making a selection of a treatment plan that satisfies said patient'"'"'s objectives.

48. The system of claim 45, wherein said software tools comprise instructions designed to aid said practitioner in (a) monitoring and tracking said patient'"'"'s progress in response to a treatment plan, and (b) in making adjustments to said treatment plan.

49. The system of claim 48, wherein said software tools further comprise a set of instructions designed to assist in (c) in scheduling said patient'"'"'s visits to said practitioner, and (d) in sending out reminders for said visits to said patient.

50. The system of claim 45, wherein said set of software tools facilitate orthodontic treatment in which the treatment comprises using the same type of orthodontic appliances (fixed or removable) at different stages of said treatment.

51. The system of claim 45, wherein said set of software tools facilitate orthodontic treatment in which said treatment comprises using both fixed and removable types of orthodontic appliances at different stages of said treatment.

52. The system of claim 45, wherein said set of software tools facilitate orthodontic treatment in which said treatment comprises using both fixed and removable types of orthodontic appliances during the same stage of said treatment.

53. The system of claim 45, wherein said set of software tools further comprises tools by which said database may be shared by more than orthodontic practices.

54. The system of claim 45, wherein said diagnostic information comprises digital 3D tooth data obtained from a hand-held three-dimensional scanner adapted for in vivo scanning.

55. The system of claim 53, wherein said workstation provides links to databases and software tools of suppliers of orthodontic treatment apparatus.

56. The system of claim 55, wherein said unified workstation further facilitates supply chain management between said practitioner and said suppliers wherein the information comprising said patient'"'"'s therapeutic plan is exchanged with software tools of said suppliers.

57. The system of claim 55, wherein said unified workstation further facilitates bidding services wherein a plurality of suppliers of orthodontic treatment apparatus submit bids to secure said practitioner'"'"'s business pertaining to said patient'"'"'s treatment plan.

58. The system of claim 45, wherein the database further stores results of a patient survey.

59. The system of claim 45, wherein said database further stores information as to the cost of orthodontic products.

60. The system of claim 45, wherein the database further stores information as to the quality or other attributes of orthodontic products.

61. The system of claim 45, wherein said diagnostic information comprises digital 3D tooth data obtained from a scan of a model of the teeth.

62. The system of claim 45, wherein the workstation further comprises a product benchmarking database containing information as to dental, surgical, and/or orthodontic products.