System and method for increasing organizational adaptability

• US 20050222893A1
• Filed: 04/05/2004
• Published: 10/06/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 04/05/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ent Services Development Corporation LP (DXC Technology Company)
• Original Assignee: Ent Services Development Corporation LP (DXC Technology Company)
• Inventors: Phifer, William H., Aerdts, Reinier J., Wacker, Jeffrey L., Kasravi, Kasra, Mears, Randall F.
• Application Number:
  US10/818,013
• Publication Number:
  US 20050222893A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/10
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management

Abstract

A method, system, and computer program product for improving an organization'"'"'s business adaptability is provided. In one embodiment, a taxonomy is created wherein the taxonomy comprises a hierarchical list of taxonomy indicators that captures organizational elements that can be used to measure an organization'"'"'s responsiveness to change and wherein the taxonomy indicators are industry specific. A set of weights associated with the elements of the taxonomy, indicating a relevant contribution of each element to an overall adaptability of an organization, are assigned. The weights are industry specific. An enterprise profile for the organization is determined and an adaptability result of the organization is calculated from the weights, taxonomy, and enterprise profile. The adaptability result provides a quantitative assessment of the organization'"'"'s adaptability. Recommendations for improving the adaptability of the organization are then determined using a rules engine and/or heuristics and utilizing the adaptability result, the taxonomy, the enterprise profile, and data gathered in creating the taxonomy, the enterprise profile, and the set of weights.

Claims

1. A method for improving an organization'"'"'s business adaptability, the method comprising:

creating a taxonomy comprising a hierarchical list of taxonomy indicators that captures organizational elements that can be used to measure an organization'"'"'s responsiveness to change wherein the taxonomy indicators are industry specific;

assigning a set of weights associated with the elements of the taxonomy, indicating a relevant contribution of each element to an overall adaptability of an organization, wherein the weights are industry specific;

determining an enterprise profile for the organization;

calculating an adaptability result of the organization from the weights, taxonomy, and enterprise profile, wherein the adaptability result provides a quantitative assessment of the organization'"'"'s adaptability; and

determining recommendations for improving the adaptability of the organization, wherein the recommendations are determined based upon the adaptability result, the taxonomy, the enterprise profile, and data gathered in creating the taxonomy, the enterprise profile, and the set of weights.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein determining recommendations comprises utilizing at least one of an expert system and heuristics.

3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the expert system comprises rules which incorporate industry best practices.

4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the expert system comprises a forward chaining rules engine.

5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the expert system comprises a backward chaining rules engine.

6. A computer program product in a computer readable media for use in a data processing system for measuring, assessing, and improving an organization'"'"'s business adaptability, the computer program product comprising:

first instructions for creating a taxonomy comprising a hierarchical list of taxonomy indicators that captures organizational elements that can be used to measure an organization'"'"'s responsiveness to change wherein the taxonomy indicators are organization and industry specific;

second instructions for assigning a set of weights associated with the elements of the taxonomy, indicating a relevant contribution of each element to an overall adaptability of an organization, wherein the weights are organization and industry specific;

third instructions for determining an enterprise profile for the organization;

fourth instructions for calculating an adaptability result of the organization from the weights, taxonomy, and enterprise profile, wherein the adaptability result provides a quantitative assessment of the organization'"'"'s adaptability; and

fifth instructions for determining recommendations for improving the adaptability of the organization, wherein the recommendations are determined based upon the adaptability result, the taxonomy, the enterprise profile, and data gathered in creating the taxonomy, the enterprise profile, and the set of weights.

7. The computer program product as recited in claim 6, wherein determining recommendations comprises utilizing at least one of an expert system and heuristics.

8. The computer program product as recited in claim 6, wherein the expert system comprises rules which incorporate industry best practices.

9. The computer program product as recited in claim 6, wherein the expert system comprises a forward chaining rules engine.

10. The computer program product as recited in claim 6, wherein the expert system comprises a backward chaining rules engine.

11. A system in a computer readable media for use in a data processing system for measuring, assessing, and improving an organization'"'"'s business adaptability, the system comprising:

first means for creating a taxonomy comprising a hierarchical list of taxonomy indicators that captures organizational elements that can be used to measure an organization'"'"'s responsiveness to change wherein the taxonomy indicators are organization and industry specific;

second means for assigning a set of weights associated with the elements of the taxonomy, indicating a relevant contribution of each element to an overall adaptability of an organization, wherein the weights are organization and industry specific;

third means for determining an enterprise profile for the organization;

fourth means for calculating an adaptability result of the organization from the weights, taxonomy, and enterprise profile, wherein the adaptability result provides a quantitative assessment of the organization'"'"'s adaptability; and

fifth means for determining recommendations for improving the adaptability of the organization, wherein the recommendations are determined based upon the adaptability result, the taxonomy, the enterprise profile, and data gathered in creating the taxonomy, the enterprise profile, and the set of weights.

12. The system as recited in claim 11, wherein determining recommendations comprises utilizing at least one of an expert system and heuristics.

13. The system as recited in claim 11, wherein the expert system comprises rules which incorporate industry best practices.

14. The system as recited in claim 11, wherein the expert system comprises a forward chaining rules engine.

15. The system as recited in claim 11, wherein the expert system comprises a backward chaining rules engine.

16. A method for improving an organization'"'"'s business adaptability, the system comprising:

determining at least one adaptability index based, at least in part, on an industry specific taxonomy, industry specific weights associated with elements of the taxonomy, and an organizational profile;

determining recommendations for improving the organization'"'"'s business adaptability utilizing the adaptability index, the taxonomy, the organizational profile, and data collected in determining the at least one adaptability index.

17. The method as recited in claim 16, wherein determining recommendations comprises utilizing a rules engine.

18. The method as recited in claim 17, wherein the rules engine comprises a forward chaining rules engine.

19. The method as recited in claim 17, wherein the rules engine comprises a backward chaining rules engine.

20. The method as recited in claim 16, wherein determining the recommendation comprises utilizing heuristics.

21. A computer program product in a computer readable media for use in a data processing system for improving an organization'"'"'s business adaptability, the computer program product comprising:

first instructions for determining at least one adaptability index based, at least in part, on an industry specific taxonomy, industry specific weights associated with elements of the taxonomy, and an organizational profile;

second instructions for determining recommendations for improving the organization'"'"'s business adaptability utilizing the adaptability index, the taxonomy, the organizational profile, and data collected in determining the at least one adaptability index.

22. The computer program product as recited in claim 21, wherein the second instructions comprises utilizing a rules engine.

23. The computer program product as recited in claim 22, wherein the rules engine comprises a forward chaining rules engine.

24. The computer program product as recited in claim 22, wherein the rules engine comprises a backward chaining rules engine.

25. The computer program product as recited in claim 21, wherein the second instructions comprises utilizing heuristics.

26. A system for improving an organization'"'"'s business adaptability, the system comprising:

first means for determining at least one adaptability index based, at least in part, on an industry specific taxonomy, industry specific weights associated with elements of the taxonomy, and an organizational profile;

second means for determining recommendations for improving the organization'"'"'s business adaptability utilizing the adaptability index, the taxonomy, the organizational profile, and data collected in determining the at least one adaptability index.

27. The system as recited in claim 26, wherein the second means comprises utilizing a rules engine.

28. The system as recited in claim 27, wherein the rules engine comprises a forward chaining rules engine.

29. The system as recited in claim 27, wherein the rules engine comprises a backward chaining rules engine.

30. The system as recited in claim 26, wherein the second means comprises utilizing heuristics.