Method and System for Determining Rate of Insurance

• US 20080126139A1
• Filed: 11/21/2007
• Published: 05/29/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 11/21/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: American International Group Incorporated
• Original Assignee: American International Group Incorporated
• Inventors: Prendergast, James Keenan, Mangold, James Kenneth
• Application Number:
  US11/944,241
• Publication Number:
  US 20080126139A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/4
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance

Abstract

A method and system for determining a rate of insurance for management liability coverage which determines a base premium, a limit/retention factor, shared limit credits, and other rating considerations. The limit/retention factor, shared limit credits, and rating considerations are applied to the base premium to ascertain a resultant premium. Another aspect of the disclosure provides a method for determining a shared limit credit when insured clients purchase multiple insurance coverages in a single policy or package of policies and subject to common limit of liability.

Claims

1. A method for creating a rate plan to determine a rate of liability insurance, implemented by a plurality of software applications executing on one or more computing systems as part of a computer network system, the method comprising:

populating a plurality fields assigned to a base premium table, a limit/retention factor table, and a shared limit credit table in a database contained in the computer network system;

populating a plurality of fields in the database assigned to a first set of risk factors applicable to generic company types;

populating a plurality of fields in the database assigned to a second set of risk factors applicable to a specific company type; and

exposing an interface to the database to permit access to the base premium table, the limit/retention factor table, shared limit credit table, first set of risk factors and second set of risk factors to calculate a resultant liability insurance premium.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of base premium rate tables are based on company type, value of assets, and industry.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of base premium rate tables includes marginal rates for incremental assets.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of shared limit credit tables are based on the shared limit credits with no sub-limits between two insurance coverages, shared limit credits with no sub-limits between multiple coverages, primary shared limit credits based on a target limit and a maximum limit, and additional shared limit credits based on a target limit and a maximum limit.

5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of tables for determining base premiums, limit/retention factors, and shared limit credits, and the plurality of tables for determining values for each risk factor based on objective criteria and underwriter concern, are stored in a plurality of databases that are part of a computer network system.

6. A method according to claim 1, wherein one or more of the plurality of software applications is a rater spreadsheet application.

7. A method according to claim 6, wherein a rater spreadsheet application comprises of a plurality of data input worksheets, base premium tables, limit/retention factor tables, shared limit credit tables, and rating modules.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of risk factors is selected from the group consisting of claim history factor, claim frequency factor, claim severity factor, financial condition factor, balance sheet factor, income statement factor, statement of cash flows factor, all other financials factor, industry factor, years in operation factor, mergers and acquisition factor, management experience/qualifications factor, litigation factor, director and officer litigation factor, other corporate litigation factor, entity/non-entity coverage factor, revenue/asset irregularities factor, specialty coverage factor, public company modifier, director and officer percent of stock factor, stock performance factor, offerings factor, compliance with corporate governance standards factor, market cap factor, non-entity EPLI factor, boards and auditors factor, loan portfolio factor, reserve adequacy factor, investment portfolio factor, regulatory environment factor, private company modifier, director and officer percent of private stock factor, ESOP ownership factor, initial public offering factor, institution of appropriate compliance/governance standards factor, public debt factor, private placement factor, non-profit organization modifier, tax status factor, percent revenues from government sources factor, healthcare institutions factor, percent of revenues from Medicare/Medicaid factor, education institutions factor, association with hospitals/medical schools factor, boards factor, institution of appropriate compliance/governance standards factor, 3(b) securities offering factor, net income factor, years in business factor, punitive damages factor, prior acts factor, limit/retention factor, nature of business factor, social welfare organization modifier, regional modifier, deductible factor, and risk-specific characteristic modifier.

9. A method according to claim 7, wherein the plurality of rating modules correspond to a plurality of risk factors, each comprising of a plurality of modes, a plurality of levels, and a plurality of factor values.;

10. A method according to claim 9, wherein a mode is selected from a group consisting of standard, extended, and restricted.

11. A method according to claim 9, wherein a level is selected from a group consisting of extremely confident, confident, comfortable, low concern, material concern, high concern, very high concern, extreme concern, and information unavailable.

12. A method according to claim 9, wherein the factor value is selected from a range from a minimum value to a maximum value with increments of a step.

13. A method according to claim 9, wherein the number of levels available for a risk factor category is based on the mode selected.

14. A method according to claim 9, wherein the minimum value, maximum value, and step of a factor are based on the level selected.

15. A method of determining a rate of insurance, implemented by a client system, a server system, and a database, that are part of a computer network system, the method comprising:

accessing the database by the client system to obtain a base premium from one of a plurality of base premium tables stored in the database;

accessing the database by the client system to obtain a limit/retention factor from a plurality of limit/retention factor tables;

accessing the database by the client system to obtain determining a shared limit credit from a plurality of shared limit credit tables;

accessing the database by the client system to obtain determining values for risk factors applicable to all company types;

accessing the database by the client system to obtain determining values for risk factors applicable to specific company types; and

calculating a resultant premium as the product of the base premium, limit/retention factor, shared limit credit, risk factors applicable to all company types, and risk factors applicable to a specific company type using at least one of a plurality of software applications.

16. A method according to claim 15, wherein the plurality of base premium rate tables are based on company type, value of assets, and industry.

17. A method according to claim 15, wherein the plurality of base premium rate tables includes marginal rates for incremental assets.

18. A method according to claim 15, wherein the plurality of shared limit credit tables are based on the shared limit credits with no sub-limits between two insurance coverages, shared limit credits with no sub-limits between multiple coverages, primary shared limit credits based on a target limit and a maximum limit, and additional shared limit credits based on a target limit and a maximum limit.

19. A method according to claim 15, wherein the plurality of tables for determining base premiums, limit/retention factors, and shared limit credits, and the plurality of tables for determining values for each risk factor based on objective criteria and underwriter concern, are stored in a plurality of databases that are part of a computer network system.

20. A method according to claim 15, wherein is the client system comprises of a rater spreadsheet application.

21. A method according to claim 20, wherein a rater spreadsheet application comprises of a plurality of data input worksheets, base premium tables, limit/retention factor tables, shared limit credit tables, and rating modules.

22. The method according to claim 15, wherein a plurality of risk factors is selected from the group consisting of claim history factor, claim frequency factor, claim severity factor, financial condition factor, balance sheet factor, income statement factor, statement of cash flows factor, all other financials factor, industry factor, years in operation factor, mergers and acquisition factor, management experience/qualifications factor, litigation factor, director and officer litigation factor, other corporate litigation factor, entity/non-entity coverage factor, revenue/asset irregularities factor, specialty coverage factor, public company modifier, director and officer percent of stock factor, stock performance factor, offerings factor, compliance with corporate governance standards factor, market cap factor, non-entity EPLI factor, boards and auditors factor, loan portfolio factor, reserve adequacy factor, investment portfolio factor, regulatory environment factor, private company modifier, director and officer percent of private stock factor, ESOP ownership factor, initial public offering factor, institution of appropriate compliance/governance standards factor, public debt factor, private placement factor, non-profit organization modifier, tax status factor, percent revenues from government sources factor, healthcare institutions factor, percent of revenues from Medicare/Medicaid factor, education institutions factor, association with hospitals/medical schools factor, boards factor, institution of appropriate compliance/governance standards factor, 3(b) securities offering factor, net income factor, years in business factor, punitive damages factor, prior acts factor, limit/retention factor, nature of business factor, social welfare organization modifier, regional modifier, deductible factor, and risk-specific characteristic modifier.

23. A method according to claim 21, wherein the plurality of rating modules correspond to a plurality of risk factors, each comprising of a plurality of modes, a plurality of levels, a plurality of factor values.

24. A method according to claim 23, wherein a mode is selected from a group consisting of standard, extended, and restricted for all rating modules.

25. A method according to claim 23, wherein a level is selected within each rating module from a group consisting of extremely confident, confident, comfortable, low concern, material concern, high concern, very high concern, extreme concern, information unavailable;

26. A method according to claim 23, wherein the factor value is selected within each rating module from a range from a minimum value to a maximum value increments of a step;

and

27. A method according to claim 23, wherein the number of levels available for a risk factor is based on the mode selected;

and

28. A method according to claim 23, wherein the minimum value, maximum value, and step for a range of factor values within each rating module are based on the level selected.

29. A method according to claim 23, wherein each rating module validates the level and risk factor value selected using validation lists.

30. A method of calculating a shared limit credit using a computing system, the method comprising:

selecting a plurality of insurance coverages that are included in an insurance policy or package of policies and share an aggregate limit of liability;

selecting a first insurance coverage from the plurality of insurance coverages that are included in a policy or an insurance package, to determine a first insurance coverage shared limit credit;

selecting a second insurance coverage from the plurality of insurance coverages that are included in a policy or an insurance package, as the coverage with the highest sub-limit of liability exclusive of the first insurance coverage;

accessing the primary shared limit credit value from a primary shared limit credit table organized to provide shared limit credit values for a plurality of target limits and maximum limits, where a target limit is a sub-limit of the first insurance coverage and a maximum limit is a sub-limit of the second insurance coverage;

selecting at least one additional insurance coverage from the plurality of insurance coverages that are included in a policy or an insurance package, that is not the first insurance coverage or the second insurance coverage;

accessing an additional shared limit credit value from an additional shared limit credit table organized to provide shared limit credit values for a plurality of target limits and maximum limits, where a target limit where the target limit is the sub-limit of a first insurance coverage and an additional maximum limit is the sub-limit of each additional insurance coverage; and

calculating the shared limit credit for a first insurance coverage by multiplying the primary shared limit credit by the additional shared limit credits for at least one additional insurance coverage.

31. A system for determining a rate of liability insurance;

the system comprising;

a database including a plurality of database tables organized to contain a rating table, a

a server system disposed to provide services upon request by a client system by performing a database query to access the database tables; and

a client system communicatively coupled with the server system, wherein the client system comprises;

a rater spreadsheet presentation interface to permit a client request to be passed to the server system and to provide the result in the rater spreadsheet presentation interface;

a rater spreadsheet application that calculates a resultant premium.

32. A system according to claim 31, wherein the system:

populates a plurality fields assigned to a base premium table, a limit/retention factor table, and a shared limit credit table in a database contained in the computer network system;

populates a plurality of fields in the database assigned to a first set of risk factors applicable to generic company types;

populates a plurality of fields in the database assigned to a second set of risk factors applicable to a specific company type; and

exposes an interface to the database to permit access to the base premium table, the limit/retention factor table, shared limit credit table, first set of risk factors and second set of risk factors to calculate a resultant liability insurance premium.

33. A system according to claim 31, wherein a rater spreadsheet application:

accesses the database to obtain a base premium from one of a plurality of base premium tables stored in the database;

accesses the database to obtain a limit/retention factor from a plurality of limit/retention factor tables;

accesses the database to obtain determining a shared limit credit from a plurality of shared limit credit tables;

accesses the database to obtain determining values for risk factors applicable to all company types;

accesses the database to obtain determining values for risk factors applicable to specific company types; and

calculates a resultant premium as the product of the base premium, limit/retention factor, shared limit credit, risk factors applicable to all company types, and risk factors applicable to a specific company type using at least one of a plurality of software applications.

34. A method according to claim 32, wherein the plurality of tables for determining base premiums, limit/retention factors, and shared limit credits, and the plurality of tables for determining values for each risk factor based on objective criteria and the level of underwriter confidence or concern, are stored in a plurality of databases that are part of a computer network system.

35. A system according to claim 31, wherein the a rater spreadsheet application comprises of a plurality of data input worksheets, base premium tables, limit/retention factor tables, shared limit credit tables, and rating modules based on risk factors.

36. A system according to claim 35, wherein each rating module comprises of a plurality of modes, a plurality of levels, and a plurality of factor values;

37. A system according to claim 36, wherein a mode is selected from a group consisting of standard, extended, and restricted for all rating modules.

38. A system according to claim 36, wherein a level is selected for each rating module from a group consisting of extremely confident, confident, comfortable, low concern, material concern, high concern, very high concern, extreme concern, and information unavailable.

39. A system according to claim 36, wherein the factor value is selected for each from a range of a minimum value for the risk factor category to a maximum value.

40. A system according to claim 36, wherein the number of levels for a risk factor category in each rating module is based on the mode selected.

41. A system according to claim 36, wherein the range and step for a factor value is based on the level selected.

42. A system according to claim 36, wherein each of the set of values for a mode, level, and factor are stored in a validation list.

43. A system according to claim 31, wherein the a rater spreadsheet application accesses applicable base premiums, marginal rates, limit/retention factor, shared limit credits, from a plurality of tables that are created by actuarial techniques, and accesses risk factors from a plurality of tables, that are stored in one or more databases in a computer network system.

44. A system according to claim 31, wherein the a rater spreadsheet application calculates the resultant premium based on the data as a product of the accessed and applicable base premium, limit/retention factor, shared limit credits, and risk factor values.

45. A system according to claim 31, wherein the communication network is selected from the group consisting of a voice network, data network, wireless network, Internet, local area network, wide area network, and a metropolitan area network.

46. A system according to claim 35, wherein the input data to a rater spreadsheet application are stored in one or more databases.

47. A system according to claim 35, wherein the rater spreadsheet presentation interface accesses its input data from one or more databases to populate the data fields of a rater spreadsheet presentation interface.

48. A system according to claim 31, wherein the rater spreadsheet application is part of an offline computer network system.

49. A system according to claim 31, wherein the rater spreadsheet application is part of an online computer network system.