EXECUTING SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE TEST JOBS IN A CLUSTERED SYSTEM

• US 20090199047A1
• Filed: 01/31/2008
• Published: 08/06/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 01/31/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Oath Inc. (Verizon Communications Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Yahoo! Inc. (Apollo Global Management, Inc.)
• Inventors: Nelson, Stephen, Wu, George, Bretoi, Daniel, Panigrahi, Sapan, Vaitheeswaran, Girish
• Application Number:
  US12/023,608
• Publication Number:
  US 20090199047A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/47.2
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3409 for performance assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3452 Performance evaluation by statistical analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3466 Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3476 Data logging G06F11/14, G06F11/2205 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3616 using software metrics
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3672 Test management
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2201/865 Monitoring of software
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2201/875 Monitoring of systems including the internet

Abstract

Using a testing framework, developers may create a test module to centralize resources and results for a software test plan amongst a plurality of systems. With assistance from the testing framework, the test module may facilitate the creation of test cases, the execution of a test job for each test case, the collection of performance statistics during each test job, and the aggregation of collected statistics into organized reports for easier analysis. The test module may track test results for easy comparison of performance metrics in response to various conditions and environments over the history of the development process. The testing framework may also schedule a test job for execution when the various systems and resources required by the test job are free. The testing framework may be operating system independent, so that a single test job may test software concurrently on a variety of systems.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for collecting performance statistics for an application running in a multiple-host system, comprising the steps of:

receiving, at a testing framework, input that specifies test details, wherein the test details comprise a test plan;

based on said input, said testing framework executing said test plan on an execution host, wherein executing the test plan comprises;

initiating execution of at least a portion of an application on each of a plurality of hosts;

receiving, from each host in the plurality of hosts, performance data indicating performance statistics for a particular period of time;

based on said performance data, the testing framework generating a test result comprising a plurality of data reports for a plurality of performance metrics; and

the testing framework presenting said test result to a user.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein a first host in the plurality of hosts is executing a first operating system and a second host of the plurality of hosts is executing a second operating system that is different from said first operating system.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the test details further comprise one or more attributes and wherein executing the test plan further comprises invoking an execution script that comprises said test plan using at least some of the one or more attributes as values for parameters to the execution script.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of said testing framework determining the identity of said execution host based on execution host characteristics defined in said test details.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of said testing framework determining the identity of said plurality of hosts based on characteristics defined in said test details.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of receiving, from each host in the plurality of hosts, performance data indicating performance statistics for a particular period of time further comprises:

at least some of said plurality of hosts copying logs of performance metrics and events to a shared storage location;

said testing framework reading said logs from said shared storage location.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the steps of receiving performance data, generating a test result, and presenting said test result are performed concurrently with the step of executing said test plan.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

receiving, at a host in said plurality of hosts, an instruction to track one or more performance metrics with a particular performance-monitoring utility;

while executing said test plan, tracking said one or more performance metrics with said performance-monitoring utility; and

wherein the performance data indicating performance statistics for a particular period of time includes values for said one or more performance metrics.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of receiving performance data comprises the step of the testing framework requesting a default set of performance data from, on each host in said plurality of hosts, a system-embedded resource monitor.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the particular period of time is defined by a start time and an end time, wherein the start time corresponds to the time at which said execution host began executing said test plan and the end time corresponds to the time at which said execution host completed executing said test plan.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the particular period of time is defined by a start time and an end time, wherein executing said test plan at said execution host comprises:

executing a set of initialization steps in said test plan;

after executing said set of initialization steps, executing a first step of said test plan that causes the execution host to create first test feedback indicating said start time; and

executing a second step of said test plan that causes the execution host to create second test feedback indicating said end time.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of generating a test result comprises filtering said performance data to include only performance data from a second period of time, wherein the second period of time is determined based at least on the execution of said test at said execution host.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of generating a test result comprises averaging performance data from each of said plurality of hosts to create a single data report.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of generating a test result comprises comparing said performance data with second performance data, wherein said second performance data was (a) generated prior to the step of executing said test plan on said execution host, and (b) generated by said plurality of hosts while executing said test plan on said execution host.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of presenting said test result to a user comprises generating one or more views for each data report in the test result, the one or more views including at least graphs and textual logs.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein:

the performance data includes a round-robin data file;

the test result includes a data report based upon said round-robin data file;

the step of presenting said test result comprises determining to generate a time-plot graph for said data report, wherein said determining is performed in response to determining that said data report is based on round-robin data.

27. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 1.

28. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 2.

29. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 3.

30. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 4.

31. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 5.

32. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 6.

33. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 7.

34. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 8.

35. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 9.

36. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 10.

37. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 11.

38. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 12.

39. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 13.

40. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 14.

41. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 15.

42. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 16.

17. A computer-implemented method for executing a test job in a test cluster comprising a plurality of systems, comprising the steps of, at a testing framework:

(1) receiving input specifying a test details for a test job, wherein the test details include a test plan for said test job;

(2) determining one or more systems in said test cluster which may be used to implement one or more steps of said test plan for said test job;

(3) determining whether any of said one or more systems are reserved for any other test job;

(4) if none of said one or more systems are reserved any other test job, executing said test job according to said test plan; and

(5) if any one of said one or more systems are reserved for another test job, waiting for a period of time and then repeating steps 3-5.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein determining said one or more systems comprises consulting a set of desired system characteristics included in said test details, the set of desired system characteristics including at least one of the following characteristics:

processor type, operating system, disk storage, system memory, and installed software.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein determining whether any of said one or more systems are reserved for any other test job comprises monitoring one or more processes executing on each of one or more systems.

20. The method of claim 19, further comprising the steps of:

maintaining reservation information for each system in the test cluster;

upon executing said test job according to said test plan, updating said reservation information to indicate that said one or more systems are reserved; and

upon detecting that the test job has completed said test plan, updating said reservation information to indicate that said one or more systems are not reserved;

wherein the step of determining whether any of said one or more systems are reserved for any other test job comprises determining whether, for each particular system of said one or more systems, the reservation information indicates that said particular system is reserved.

43. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 17.

44. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 18.

45. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 19.

46. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 20.

21. A computer-implemented method for executing a test job for testing software performance in a test cluster comprising a plurality of systems, comprising the steps of:

at said testing framework, performing the steps of;

receiving input specifying a test details for said test job, wherein the test details include a test plan for said test job;

determining one or more resources required to implement said test plan;

determining one or more systems in said test cluster that may be said one or more resources to implement the steps of said test plan for said test job;

determining that a particular system of said one or more systems does not comprise at least one of said one or more resources;

causing said one or more resources to be installed on said particular system;

executing said test job according to said test plan.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein said one or more resources include an execution script comprising code representing said test plan.

23. The method of claim 21 wherein said one or more resources include test data to be processed by said software.

24. The method of claim 21 wherein said one or more resources include configuration information.

25. The method of claim 21 wherein said one or more resources include a component of said software.

26. The method of claim 21 wherein said one or more resources include a package required to run a component of said software.

47. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 21.

48. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 22.

49. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 23.

50. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 24.

51. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 25.

52. A computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 26.