Human amalgamation ratiocination process sublimation system

• US 20090258334A1
• Filed: 04/10/2009
• Published: 10/15/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 04/10/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ken A. Pyne
• Original Assignee: Ken A. Pyne
• Inventors: Pyne, Ken A.
• Application Number:
  US12/384,956
• Publication Number:
  US 20090258334A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/236
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

A computer implemented process for evaluating a person'"'"'s employment potential including the steps of:

evaluating the person'"'"'s willingness to relocate based on a first set of questions and expressing that willingness as a first number;
evaluating the person'"'"'s ability to work a length of time each day based on a second set of questions and expressing that willingness as a second number;
evaluating a person'"'"'s sense of influence and control based on a drawing test and expressing that sense as a third number;
evaluating a person'"'"'s current employment characteristics in terms of company opportunity, advancement opportunity, work satisfaction and compensation and mathematically expressing the employment characteristics as a fourth number;
and making a career choice based on mathematically combining the first, second, third and fourth numbers.

Claims

1. A computer implemented process for evaluating a person including the steps of:

evaluating the person'"'"'s willingness to relocate based on a first set of questions and expressing that willingness as a first number;

evaluating the person'"'"'s ability to work a length of time each day based on a second set of questions and expressing that willingness as a second number;

evaluating a person'"'"'s sense of influence and control based on a drawing test and expressing that sense as a third number;

evaluating a person'"'"'s current employment characteristics in terms of company opportunity, advancement opportunity, work satisfaction and compensation and mathematically expressing the employment characteristics as a fourth number;

and making a career choice based on mathematically combining the first, second, third and fourth numbers.

2. The process recited in claim 1 wherein said employment characteristics can be calculated for a potential career opportunity to generate a fifth number and the fourth number can be compared to the fifth number to make a career decision about the potential career opportunity.

3. The process recited in claim 1 including the steps of creating a candidate profile based on said first, second, third and fourth numbers and providing access to a web page containing the person'"'"'s profile over a computer network.

4. The process recited in claim 1 including the step of expressing at least some of the first, second, third and fourth numbers as familiar game pieces to aid in coaching the person in career decisions.

5. The process recited in claim 1 wherein said first number is added to said second number and averaged to calculate a magnitude score and assigning a chess piece to the person based on the magnitude score and then calculating a degree of self absorption based on the magnitude score.

6. The process recited in claim 1 including the further step of asking the person an additional third set of questions wherein the third set of questions are divided into questions about the person'"'"'s desire for power, the person'"'"'s intelligence and the person'"'"'s empathy and wherein the third set of questions are scored on responses being one response from the possible responses of very seldom, seldom, sometimes, often and very often and wherein a grid total score is calculated for all the questions and a secondary score is calculated based on the number of times the same response is used wherein the secondary score is used to indicate the person'"'"'s pragmatism.

7. A computer implemented process for evaluating a candidate including the steps of:

evaluating the candidate'"'"'s willingness to relocate based on a first set of questions and expressing that willingness as a first number;

evaluating the candidate'"'"'s ability to work a length of time each day based on a second set of questions and expressing that willingness as a second number;

evaluating a candidate'"'"'s sense of influence and control based on a drawing test and expressing that sense as a third number;

evaluating a candidate'"'"'s current employment characteristics in terms of company opportunity, advancement opportunity, work satisfaction and compensation and mathematically expressing the employment characteristics as a fourth number;

and making a recommendation based on analysis of the first, second, third and fourth numbers.

8. The process recited in claim 7 including the further step of asking the candidate an additional third set of questions wherein the third set of questions are divided into questions about the candidate'"'"'s desire for power, the candidate'"'"'s intelligence and the candidate'"'"'s empathy and wherein the third set of questions are scored on responses being one response from the possible responses of very seldom, seldom, sometimes, often and very often and wherein a grid total score is calculated for all the questions and a secondary score is calculated based on the number of times the same response is used wherein the secondary score is used to indicate the candidate'"'"'s pragmatism.

9. The process recited in claim 8 wherein said employment characteristics can be calculated for a potential career opportunity to generate a fifth number and the fourth number can be compared to the fifth number to make a decision about the potential career opportunity.

10. The process recited in claim 8 including the steps of creating a candidate profile based on said first, second, third and fourth numbers and providing access to the candidate'"'"'s profile over a computer network.

11. A computer network implemented process for evaluating a candidate including the steps of:

calculating the candidate'"'"'s willingness to relocate based on a first set of questions and expressing that willingness as a first number;

calculating the candidate'"'"'s ability to work a length of time each day based on a second set of questions and expressing that willingness as a second number;

calculating a candidate'"'"'s sense of influence and control based on a drawing test and expressing that sense as a third number;

calculating a candidate'"'"'s current employment characteristics including at least one of company opportunity, advancement opportunity, work satisfaction and compensation and expressing the employment characteristics as a fourth number;

and making a recommendation based on analysis of the first, second, third and fourth numbers.