AUTOMATED LANDING AREA DETECTION FOR AIRCRAFT

• US 20100039294A1
• Filed: 08/14/2008
• Published: 02/18/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 08/14/2008
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Original Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Inventors: He, Gang, Feyereisen, Thea L., Wyatt, Ivan S.
• Application Number:
  US12/191,491
• Publication Number:
  US 20100039294A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/972
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 7/412 based on a comparison between measured values and known or stored values
• CPC Class Codes: G06V 10/751 Comparing pixel values or logical combinations thereof, or feature values having positional relevance, e.g. template matching
• CPC Class Codes: G06V 20/17 taken from planes or by drones
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0086 for monitoring terrain radar or analogous systems specially adapted for terrain avoidance G01S13/935
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/025 Navigation or guidance aids radar or analogous systems specially adapted for landing purposes G01S13/913

Abstract

A system for detecting a landing area or runway for an aircraft includes a detection subsystem, a processor architecture, flight deck instrumentation, and a runway feature template database. The system is operated to perform an automated method for visually confirming the presence of a runway on approach. The method obtains sensor data indicative of an approach area of the aircraft, and extracts visually distinguishable features of the approach area from the sensor data. The method also accesses the runway feature template corresponding to the intended approach runway for the aircraft, fits the visually distinguishable features to the runway feature template, and provides flight crew feedback in response to the fitting step.

Claims

1. A method for detecting a landing area for an aircraft, the method comprising:

obtaining sensor data indicative of an approach area of the aircraft;

extracting distinguishable features of the approach area from the sensor data;

comparing characteristics of the distinguishable features to one or more environment features associated with a desired landing area for the aircraft; and

providing flight crew feedback in response to the comparing step.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein providing flight crew feedback comprises:

in response to the comparing step, determining that the distinguishable features are indicative of the desired landing area for the aircraft; and

thereafter generating a clear-to-proceed indicator.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein providing flight crew feedback comprises:

in response to the comparing step, determining that the distinguishable features are not indicative of the desired landing area for the aircraft; and

thereafter generating a warning indicator.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more environment features comprise one or more runway features.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more runway features comprise runway edges, runway markings, or runway lighting components.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing characteristics comprises fitting the distinguishable features to a generic runway feature template.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing characteristics comprises fitting the distinguishable features to a runway feature template corresponding to an intended approach runway for the aircraft.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing characteristics comprises comparing characteristics of received signal patterns corresponding to the approach area of the aircraft.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining an extent of matching between the distinguishable features and the environment features; and

evaluating the extent of matching relative to a matching threshold;

wherein

providing flight crew feedback is influenced by the evaluating step.

10. A system for detecting a landing area for an aircraft, the system comprising:

an onboard detection subsystem configured to obtain sensor data indicative of an approach area of the aircraft;

a processor architecture coupled to the onboard detection subsystem, the processor architecture being configured to;

receive the sensor data;

extract visually distinguishable features of the approach area from the sensor data; and

fit the visually distinguishable features to a runway feature template; and

a flight deck instrument coupled to the processor architecture, the flight deck instrument being configured to generate feedback that is influenced by the extent of matching of the visually distinguishable features to the runway feature template.

11. The system of claim 10, the onboard detection subsystem comprising a millimeter-wave radar subsystem.

12. The system of claim 10, the flight deck instrument being controlled to generate a clear-to-proceed indicator if the visually distinguishable features fit the runway feature template.

13. The system of claim 10, the flight deck instrument being controlled to generate a warning indicator if the visually distinguishable features do not fit the runway feature template.

14. The system of claim 10, further comprising a template database coupled to the processor architecture, the template database containing a plurality of runway feature templates, each corresponding to a different runway.

15. An automated method for visually confirming a landing area for an aircraft, the method comprising:

obtaining sensor data indicative of an approach area of the aircraft;

extracting visually distinguishable features of the approach area from the sensor data;

accessing a runway feature template corresponding to an intended approach runway for the aircraft;

fitting the visually distinguishable features to the runway feature template; and

providing flight crew feedback in response to the fitting step.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein providing flight crew feedback comprises generating a clear-to-proceed indicator if fitting the visually distinguishable features to the runway feature template satisfies a threshold confidence criteria.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein providing flight crew feedback comprises generating a warning indicator if fitting the visually distinguishable features to the runway feature template fails to satisfy a threshold confidence criteria.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein accessing the runway feature template comprises retrieving the runway feature template from a template database that contains a plurality of runway feature templates, each corresponding to a different runway.

19. The method of claim 15, wherein the visually distinguishable features correspond to one or more of:

an edge of the intended approach runway;

an alphanumeric marking on the intended approach runway;

a lighting component of the intended approach runway;

a structure proximate the intended approach runway;

or

an edge of another runway proximate the intended approach runway.

20. The method of claim 15, wherein obtaining sensor data comprises obtaining millimeter-wave radar data from an onboard radar subsystem.