MIXED ENCLAVE OPERATION IN A COMPUTER NETWORK

• US 20100064352A1
• Filed: 11/13/2009
• Published: 03/11/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 07/30/1996
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Micron Technology, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Micron Technology, Inc.
• Inventors: Snow, David W., Levin, Stephen E., Wrench, Edwin H., Holden, James M.
• Application Number:
  US12/618,648
• Publication Number:
  US 20100064352A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 726/4
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/31 User authentication
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2211/001 In-Line Device
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2211/005 Network, LAN, Remote Access, Distributed System
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2211/007 Encryption, En-/decode, En-/decipher, En-/decypher, Scramble, (De-)compress
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2211/009 Trust
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2101 Auditing as a secondary aspect
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0218 Distributed architectures, e.g. distributed firewalls
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0428 wherein the data content is protected, e.g. by encrypting or encapsulating the payload
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0823 using certificates cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication involving certificates H04L9/3263
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/105 Multiple levels of security
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/12 Applying verification of the received information cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for data integrity or data verification H04L9/32
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/126 the source of the received data
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 9/40 Network security protocols

Abstract

A method is disclosed for mixed enclave operation of a computer network with users employing a multi-level network security interface and users without any network security interface. Either the network security user selects or the network security interface automatically selects whether communications are permissible with other unsecured users. Where a mixed enclave operation is selected, the network security user identifies when communications are being undertaken with another secured user or a non-secured user. Communications with a non-secured user at a lower security level entail securing the data residing with the secured user from transmission back to the non-secured user.

Claims

1. A system for communicating over a network having a plurality of secured users utilizing multi-level network security devices and a plurality of unsecured users employing no network security devices, the system comprising:

a first multi-level network security device configured to;

intercept a message from a first user; and

discard the message if the message violates security parameters;

wherein in a first mode, the first multi-level network security device is configured to send the message to a second user, and

wherein in a second mode, the first multi-level network security device comprises an encryptor configured to encrypt the message and send the encrypted message to a second multi-level network security device.

2. The system of claim 1 further comprising an interface unit configured to send the message from the first user.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein in the second mode, the second multi-level network security device comprises a decryptor configured to decrypt the message and send the decrypted message to a third user selected from the plurality of secured users.

4. The system of claim 1, further comprising a third multi-level network security device configured to intercept the encrypted message, validate a signature of the first multi-level network security interface, and send the encrypted message from the third multi-level network security device to the second multi-level network security device.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein each multi-level network security device is configured to use association establishment messages for authenticating other multi-level network security devices.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein each multi-level network security device is configured to use association establishment messages for exchanging security parameters between the multi-level network security devices.

7. The system of claim 1 wherein the message comprises a datagram.

8. A system for mixed enclave communications over a network having both secured and unsecured users, the system comprising:

a network security device configured to permit communication over the network between one of the secured users and one of the unsecured users, and further configured to dynamically determine whether a user initiating communication is one of the secured users or one of the unsecured users;

wherein the network security device is configured to use association establishment messages sent over the network for the secured users in authenticating each other, and wherein the network security device is configured to use association establishment messages for the secured users exchanging security parameters.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the network security device is configured to examine Internet Protocol (IP) addresses for identifying the secured and unsecured users.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein the network security device comprises an encryptor configured to encrypt information residing with one of the secured users.

11. The system of claim 8 wherein the message comprises a datagram.

12. The system of claim 8 wherein the network security device is configured to create an entry in an association table indicative of a source of a received message.

13. A method for establishing association over a network between a plurality of secured users utilizing multi-level network security devices and a plurality of unsecured users, the method comprising:

receiving and storing at a first security device a message from a source user to a destination user;

transmitting from the first security device an association request message to a destination user upon receipt of the message;

receiving an association grant message in response to the association request message from a second security device after the second security device has determined that an association between the source user and the destination user is permitted, wherein no other security devices exist between the destination user and the second security device; and

sending the stored message to the second security device.

14. The method of claim 13 further comprising determining at the second security device whether security parameters are violated.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein the second security device transmits the association grant message when no security parameters are violated.

16. The method of claim 13 further comprising sending the message from the second security device to the destination user when the source user and the destination user have the same security level.

17. The method of claim 13 further comprising predicting and storing a destination user response at the second security device prior to sending the message from the second security device to the destination user when the source user has a lower security level than the destination user.

18. The method of claim 13 further comprising sending the message from the second security device to the destination user when the second security device retrieves a predicted destination user response and the source user has a higher security level than the destination user.

19. The method of claim 13 further comprising erasing the message when no predicted destination user response exists and the source user has a higher security level than the destination user.

20. The method of claim 13 wherein receiving a message comprises receiving a datagram.