SEARCH RESULT PROCESSING

• US 20150193436A1
• Filed: 10/16/2014
• Published: 07/09/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 01/08/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Kent D. Slaney
• Original Assignee: Kent D. Slaney
• Inventors: SLANEY, KENT D.
• Application Number:
  US14/515,763
• Publication Number:
  US 20150193436A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/334 Query execution G06F16/335 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/338 Presentation of query results

Abstract

A plurality of portions of a first document in a list of documents may be compared to portions of other documents in the list of documents. The documents may be scored by determining how often portions of the first document correspond to portions of other documents in the list of documents. A consensus may be reached as to correctness of portions of documents in the list of documents by crediting a portion of a document whenever it corresponds to a portion of another document. If desired, a linguistic parser may be used to identify portions of a document. It may be desired to use word stemming or a Bayesian reference network in comparing portions of documents. Advertising and/or other extraneous portions of the documents may be deleted. The documents may be ranked relative to each other as a function of how often portions of each document correspond to portions of other documents.

Claims

1. A search result processing method which includes the following steps:

receiving a list of documents, each document in the list of documents having previously been determined to be likely to be relevant to the subject matter of a user query;

determining a plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents;

comparing a plurality of portions of a first document in the list of documents to portions of documents in the list of documents;

determining how often portions of the first document in the list of documents correspond to portions of other documents in the list of documents; and

scoring portions of the first document by determining how often portions of the first document correspond to portions of other documents in the list of documents.

2. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of determining how often portions of the first document in the list of documents correspond to portions of other documents in the list of documents includes determining how often and well portions of documents in the list of documents correspond to portions of the first document and said step of scoring portions of the first document includes crediting portions of the first document as a function of how often and well portions of documents in the list of documents correspond to portions of the first document.

3. A method as set forth in claim 1 further including the steps of comparing a plurality of portions of each of the documents other than the first document to portions of documents in the list of documents, determining how often portions of each of the document other than the first document correspond to portions of documents in the list of documents, and scoring portions of each of the documents other than the first document by determining how often portions of documents other than the first document correspond to portions of documents in the list of documents.

4. A method as set forth in claim 3 further including the step of creating a summary of the documents in the list of documents as a function of the scoring of portions of each of the documents in the list of document.

5. A method as set forth in claim 3 wherein said step of determining how often portions of each of the documents other than the first document correspond to portions of documents in the list of documents includes determining how often and well portions of each of the documents in the list of documents other than the first document correspond to portions of documents in the list of documents, said step of scoring portions of each of the documents other than the first document includes crediting portions of each of the documents other than the first document in the list of documents as a function of how often and well portions of each of the documents in the list of documents correspond to portions of documents in the list of documents.

6. A method as set forth in claim 1 further including the step of ranking the documents in the list of documents relative to each other as a function of how often portions of each document correspond to portions of other documents in the list of documents.

7. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of receiving a list of documents includes receiving a list of documents each one of which has been initially ranked relative to other documents in the list of documents as function of the relevance of the content of the one document to the user query, said method further includes reranking the documents relative to each other as a function of how often portions of each document correspond to portions of other documents in the list of documents.

8. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of receiving a list of documents includes receiving a list of documents each one of which has been initially ranked relative to other documents in the list of documents as a function of the relevance of the content of the one document to the user query, said method further includes reranking the documents relative to each other as a function of both their initial ranking and how often portions of each document correspond to portions of other documents in the list of documents.

9. A method as set of forth in claim 1 further including the step of creating a summary of the documents in the list of documents, said step of creating a summary of the documents in the list of documents includes selecting a portion of one document in the list of documents and selecting portions of other documents in the list of documents which are different than the selected portion of the one document.

10. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of determining a plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents includes using a linguistic parser to identify sentences in each of the documents in the list of documents.

11. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of determining a plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents includes using a linguistic parser to identify paragraphs in each of the documents in the list of documents.

12. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of determining a plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents includes using a linguistic parser to identify concepts in each of the documents in the list of documents.

13. A method as set forth in claim 1 further including the step of creating a summary of the contents of the list document in the list of documents as a function of content of portions of a plurality of the documents in the list for which the summary is being created.

14. A method as set forth in claim 1 further including repeating said step of comparing one portion of a first document in the list of documents to the plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents for each portion of the first document.

15. A method as set forth in claim 1 further including the step of separating advertising sections from remaining portions of each document in the list of documents.

16. A method as set forth in claim 15 wherein said step of separating advertising sections from remaining portions of each document includes using heuristic rules.

17. A method as set forth in claim 15 wherein said step of separating advertising sections from remaining portions of each document including parsing the hyper text markup language for each document.

18. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of comparing one portion of a first document in the list documents to the plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents includes using word matching techniques to determine when the one portion of the first document corresponds to a portion of a document.

19. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of comparing one portion of a first document in the list of documents to the plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents includes using word stemming techniques to reduce words in the plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents to base forms, said step of comparing one portion of a first document in the list of documents to the plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents includes comparing base forms of words in the one portion of the first document in the list of documents to base forms of words in the plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents.

20. A method as set forth in claim 1 further including the step of creating a summary of the documents as a function of distinctions between portions of the first document and portions of other documents in the list of documents.

21. A method as set forth in claim 1 further including determining words which negate in portions of any of the documents in the list of documents and considering the effect of any words which negate in performing said steps of comparing a plurality of portions of the first document to portions of other documents in the list of documents and in performing said step of determining how often portions of the first document in the list of documents correspond to portion of other documents in the list of documents.

22. A search result processing method which includes the following steps:

receiving a list of documents, each document in the list of documents having previously been determined to be likely to be relevant to the subject matter of a user query;

determining a plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents;

comparing portions in each of the documents in the list of documents to each other; and

reaching a consensus as to correctness of portions of the documents in the list of documents by crediting a portion of a document whenever it corresponds to a portion of another document and determining that portions of documents receiving the most credit are more likely to be correct than portions of documents receiving less credit.

23. A method as set forth in claim 22 wherein said step of reaching a consensus as to correctness of portions of documents by crediting a portion of a document whenever it corresponds to a portion of another document includes determining how often and well a portion of one document corresponds to a portion of another document.

24. A method as set forth in claim 22 wherein said step of comparing portions in each of the documents to each other includes comparing all of the portions of each one of the documents in the list of documents to all of the portions of the other documents in the list of documents.

25. A method as set forth in claim 22 wherein said step of determining a plurality of portions in each of the documents in the list of documents includes using a linguistic parser to locate portions in each of the documents.

26. A method as set forth in claim 22 further including creating a summary of each document in the list of documents as a function of the content of the portions of the documents for which the summary is being created.

27. A method as set forth in claim 22 wherein said step of determining a plurality of portions of each of the documents in the list of documents includes determining a plurality of portions which are free of advertising material in each of the documents.

28. A method as set in claim 22 further including the step of separating extraneous material from the main body of each document in the list of documents prior to performing said step of determining a plurality of portions in each of the documents.