In recent weeks, two federal judges have held that the filing of Alice motions and other briefs served as the waiver of an improper venue defense in cases in which defendants had explicitly reserved their right to challenge venue in initial pleadings. On July 5, District Judge Marilyn L. Huff of the Southern District of California denied a motion to dismiss due to improper venue filed by HTC in a case filed by InfoGation Corporation (3:16-cv-01902), citing the defendant’s February motion for judgment on the pleadings under Alice as a dispositive factor. Similarly, on July 11, Magistrate Judge John D. Love of the Eastern District of Texas issued a report and recommendation that a motion to dismiss due to improper venue filed by Carbonite should be denied, in one of the many cases filed by Realtime Data LLC (6:17-cv-00121).
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- REALTIME DATA, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters et al
- Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters et al
- Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al
- REALTIME DATA, LLC D/B/A/ IXO, v. CME Group Inc. et al
- REALTIME DATA, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al
- REALTIME DATA, LLC D/B/A/ IXO, v. Morgan Stanley et al
- REALTIME DATA, LLC d/b/a IXO v. PACKETEER, INC. et al
- Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc. et al
- Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A/ IXO, v. Morgan Stanley et al
- Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc. et al
